Stags

 

            Stags, by Cameron Corcoran, marks my return to live theatre after Covid 19 closed London's theatre industry in March 2020. It was certainly a good return.

            Set in the home of a working class family in Dublin, Ireland, we explore the relationship between two estranged brothers, their absent mother, and their father who sits dead in his armchair. Maybe not everyone's choice for a 'Welcome back to live theatre after a year' kind of show, but then I'm not everyone. 

            The show is an Off Main Stage production, who are a theatre company consisting of writers, directors and actors who are "committed to bring real life stories to the stage" and who "aim to give a voice to issues that are not given their due in todays world". The theatre, Network Theatre, is a little hidden gem in London. And i mean hidden. Down what can only be described as a service road/tunnel inside Waterloo Station, its a theatre that not many avid London theatre goers even know exists. With a usual capacity of around 70 (currently due to Covid restrictions reduced to a maximum capacity of just 50%) it is a really intimate space. Perfect for a show such as Stags, where as an audience we are just a fly on the wall.

            The set is simple and sparse. Black walls and a black floor, with a few well positioned props and set pieces to imply the location. I'm not the biggest fan of such sets, however for such a small theatre it is perfect and allowed the story to shine through. With deep seated hatred, resentment and jealousy, this pressure-cooker of a play has comedic moments that perfectly break the harsh realities of what's unfolding in front of us.

            The two brothers have an uneasy relationship. They share parents and they were both mentally and physically abused by their father. That's where their similarities end. One, Tony, has become a teacher and made something of his life. The other, Conn, has just been released from prison after seven years. Conn hates him for leaving him alone with their father. He is also of the belief that Tony thinks himself better than and above him. That he resents his upbringing and doesn't acknowledge where he comes from. This is undoubtedly true, though one can never truly forget and/or be unaffected by ones upbringing and childhood experiences. This becomes all to clear in the plays final moments.

            A gritty portrayal of the Irish working class, of broken family dynamics and of relationships. At around an hour in length, this is a brilliant way to reintroduce yourself back into live theatre after their Covid closure.

Stags is running at the Network Theatre until May 22nd

For more information, or to book tickets, please click here.

Rabbits In The Precambrian

          When I got invited to this show, I was intrigued. It sounded like nothing I'd seen before. The show sees evolutionary biologist Reed (Liam Croker) have his entire view of the world changed by the rumor of a rabbit fossil being found in a Precambrian rock: a scientific impossibility. His partner Jess (Olivia Noyce) doesn't help the situation with her endless stories about death. His colleague Clair (Charis Murray) with her obscure thought-experiments along with her husband Nick (Jamie Patterson) only add to the confusion, all centering around Nick's obsession with the charismatic one-man-cult leader, The Guru (Alexandra Octavia). Reed is forced to question whether rational thinking is really the best way to cope with this unpredictable universe. An interesting and strange description of a show, so you can see why I was intrigued. The fact I once worked at the Natural History Museum in London also means I have some scientific knowledge/understanding that only added to my interest.

          For those of you that don't know, the Precambrian is the earliest part of Earth's history and accounts for roughly 88% of the Earth's geologic time. Relatively little is known about the Precambrian, despite it making up roughly seven-eighths of the Earth's history, and what is known was largely discovered from the 1960s onwards. It spans from the formation of the Earth about 4.6 billion years ago all the way to the start of the Cambrian period roughly 541 million years ago, when hard-shelled creatures first appeared in abundance. A specific date for the origin of life has never been determined, however well preserved microscopic fossils of bacteria older then 3.46 billion years have been found in western Australia and Carbon has been found in 3.8 billion year old rocks from islands off western Greenland which may be of organic origin. However there is evidence that life could have evolved over 4.28 billion years ago. There is a fairly solid record of bacterial life throughout the remainder of the Precambrian. This would mean for a rabbit fossil to be found in rocks that predate mammals is scientifically impossible, and would destroy all our modern scientific understanding of Earth and life as we know it. Thus we have the premise of the play.

          The show is playing at The Front Room in Croydon south London, a space that creates a diverse programming of musical and theatrical performances. The venue states that it is "always striving to find a balance between 'top-class' live quality and accessibility." Located in two converted shops only a short walk from East Croydon station, the outside is fairly unassuming. Metal shutters pulled down covered in graffiti. Inside though is a pleasant surprise. A small yet attractive bar area, that has a very young feel about it, greats you as you walk in. The theare space itself is also small, with a very wide yet shallow stage. It looks very roughly put together, but then the space is used for a variety of activities so a more permanent structure would I assume be unhelpful in the space. The size of the space does however mean there is a very intimate feeling, with seating for maybe 30 people at most. The show is just the second full length production for Wrong Shoe Theatre who have become the resident theatre company of The Front Room.

          Walking into the theatre space as an audience we were greeted by Alexandra Octavia, who plays The Guru, sat on the front of the stage and 'meditating'. The space in darkened with the sound of ethereal music flooding the room, broken occasionally with the sound of waves or crackling fire. This helps you as an audience member become relaxed and calm, engrossed in the atmosphere of this meditating Guru. The show starts, once the lights go down, with The Guru standing up and talking to the audience and explain who she is and what she believes. Alexandra's performance as The Guru was rather over exaggerated, with constant movement of her arms and a general attitude that showed a lack of sincerity and believability to/about her character. I felt it rather over the top at points but then maybe this is what the director Michael Greenwood wanted, though I felt it an insult to the writing. Many lines were lost and lacked the comic impact I'm sure they were intended to have. The Guru is the cross between a drugged up hippie and a posh millennial from Notting Hill. Perfect for the role of the cultist Guru, but as I said it felt a little over the top occasionally. So much so in fact that at times I struggled to understand what she was saying, with unclear diction and melodic talking. I get that this is the character, but one still needs to be able to understand what they're listening to.

          Out of the cast of 5 there were two that stood out for me. This was Charis Murray as Claire and Jamie Patterson as Nick. Charis was extremely naturalistic, grounding her character and giving her a real personality, and an absolute joy to watch and listen to. She interacted well with the other cast members as was always making herself noticeable in the crowd, even when she wasn't a main participant in the scene. Her Scottish twang was calming in an often confusing and complicated mix of scientific jargon and overly long scenes. Jamie Patterson who played the bumbling fool that was Nick also a breath of fresh air. His comedic timing and portrayal of such an idiotic and simple minded man was a joy. Yes a bit over the top, but it was needed. He bought a lightness to an otherwise heavy show, full of moral, scientific and religious themes. These two are as far as I'm concerned already perfectly able to go into more main stream theatre. They know exactly how to fill a stage and realistically portray a character, whilst also having sometimes totally unbelievable or exaggerated characteristics. They absolutely made this show for me, otherwise I would have become slightly uninterested. They were let down by a cast that were otherwise rather monotone in their line delivery along with a lack of realism, which only prolonged the show more. There was a general feeling of the actors feeling slightly uncomfortable with the work and this didn't sit well with me. 

          I must also mention the lighting. For the majority of the show it was neither good nor bad. It suited the show wonderfully. However this wasn't the case for the start of the show when we as an audience are spoken to be The Guru. I believe Alfie Rackley, the lighting designer, was trying to go for a hippie like feel being almost psychedelic, however it was more confusing and distracting than anything. It seemed like the lights was changing every thirty seconds. Just some soft lighting with maybe a pinkish or bluish glow would have done. I was worried the whole show would be like this, but I had no need to be. 

          I'd like to say that the ending came out of the blue and was shocking, however that would be untrue. I hadn't predicted it totally correct, but it certainly wasn't a surprise. In no way does this mean the show failed at all, I just like for shows to keep me on my toes and this didn't happen this time. Also the ending seemed rather abrupt. It left questions unanswered and left me more confused than I had been at the start. The writer, Josh King, has a lovely writing style that is realistic and that has a lovely overall flow. This piece may need some extra tweaking for it to be perfect and I'm sure Josh has many good stories up his sleeve. The show has much potential, though I feel it was rather lacking with with production.

The show is running until the 15th September. For tickets and info, click here.

Lone Star Diner

          Set against the backdrop of an American diner located in the middle-of-nowhere in the New Mexico desert, Lone Star Diner looks at the relationship between the four main characters. These relationships mainly focus around the Diner's only waitress, June. Ultimately she must revaluate her life and the choices that she's made. The writer has said he intends for the show to look at 'the American dream' and feminine liberation from a patriarchal system that often is degrading for women. Lofty ambitions. I'm afraid to say I didn't think it quite reached them. The set perfectly reflects the bleakness of the situation our characters find themselves in. A relatively large stage covered in a black and white lino checked flooring. Just three small metal tables each with two chairs, and a small counter draped with bunting that has the American flag, fill the expanse of stage. Surrounding the stage is a continual mound of sand/dirt, that in my opinion neither added to nor distracted from the show itself. It just was.

          The fact the writer of this show, Cameron Corcoran, studied Criminology was for me all too clear in this show. He delves deep into the conscious and sub-conscious minds of the characters, constantly bombarding us with their complexities. Its a fascinating look into the human condition. Just what are we capable of? How far will we go? With periods of action mixed with quieter moments of reflection, as an audience we often have the opportunity to look inwardly at ourselves and ask; What would I do in that situation?

          I can, in some strange way, almost relate to the bleakness of the situation our characters find themselves in. Let me explain. When I was 11 or 12 my family and I drove across America. Near the start of our journey we were driving from Los Angeles to Las Vegas, passing through Death Valley. We drove for hours, seeing no vehicles and nothing but rocks and dirt. Suddenly we arrived in a VERY small town on the junction of some crossroads in the middle of nowhere. Bet there, amongst the abandoned looking buildings was a KFC. There were no cars in the car park, yet inside were 6 members of staff. How could this place make a profit? Surely it couldn't get enough customers? Still tot his day its a story that my family talk about. This random KFC. The setting of this Diner very much reminds of of this KFC. The show flooded my head with memories of that day, and it was as though it had happened yesterday, rather than 20 years ago.

          The script did, at times, seem to jump around making situations or lines seem slightly out of place. I did at times find it hard to hear, due to the audience not the actors, so it may just be I missed something rather than the script. having read the script though I don't think this is the case. Certain things/events that were mentioned seemed to come out of nowhere and they were never mentioned again. There were also moments were there was a lack of emotion from characters. Maybe this was what the director and/or writer wanted but it seemed to slow down the play. The flow was generally good however these slower moments with a lack of emotion, intended or otherwise, really didn't sit well with me. It also didn't help that Seamus Dillane, playing our villain Cyrus, really couldn't do an American accent. He says he can do 'American-California, American-Standard' but that, I'm afraid, simply isn't the case. He would occasionally start talking with an American twang, would get maybe four or five words out but then would delve back into something that can only be described as a posh cockney. It was extremely off putting and very frustrating to watch, especially since the other three members of cast had no issue with the accent. His lack of maintaining an accent was a great disservice to some wonderful writing by Cameron.

          Billie Hamer's performance of our protagonist, the waitress June, was enthralling. She made the character of June so believable and someone you were able to connect to, almost like you knew everything about her. You could feel her pain from the moment she stepped on stage. This is all one can really ask of an actor, however is amazing how many professional actors fail to do this. Billie was very naturalistic and seemed to just float through he performance without even trying. She was an absolute joy to watch. I was also very impressed with Jack Sunderland as the police officer Billy Lee. He had the most comedic moment of the show, but also had one of the most shocking lines I think I've ever heard in a play; 'My bidding's to skull fuck you with your own fucking arm'. Now there had been a fair amount of swearing by this point, and I'm not adverse to profanity in shows, but this just seemed a bit much. Especially for the character. Yes he's tied to a chair, but it just didn't seem like something he'd say. You could tell the whole audience were in shock and taken a back. 

          I must finish be saying how stunning Daniel Maxted has been with his lighting design. One specific moment, when June lights a cigarette, was like something out of film noir. It was stunningly beautiful and I couldn't help but smile. I had to really resist the desire to just stand and clap it was so beautiful. Emotive yet realistic it pulled you as a viewer even further into this world. No words needed to be spoken for characters thoughts to be all too clear.

          The show is being produced by Off Main Stage, a theatre company that is devoted to new writing. They have only been running since 2017, and so are still finding their feet with Lone Star Diner is their first show they have created independently in London. They have a mission to 'tell modern stories for modern audiences' as they say contemporary stories don't get enough attention in UK theatres. This is interesting to me, as I immediately felt that this story was set in the 80s. I don't know why as no suggestion of that was made, there was just a feeling I got. I can see the effort Off Main Stage put into this production, and how hard their whole team work, and so I'm sure they will go far as a theatre company. 

          An overall interesting production, by a writer who seems to be nearly at the point of finding his voice. Its clear that when he does he will be thought-provoking, shocking and yet relatable in his style. This production could have done with a little more work, as it has the potential to be such an interesting and thought provoking piece. Don't get me wrong, it was good. I just feel it hasn't reached its full potential.

This production has now finished, however you can see what else is on at the Omnibus Theatre here.

For more information about the theatre company Off Main Stage, please click here.

CAMP

          A Lesbian, a bisexual woman and a gay man walk into a bar ……. well, they walk into the theatre space above it. I was very much looking forward to this show as the concept sounded interesting. "Join Felix, Becky, and Mary as they attempt to learn what we were never taught; same-sex-sex-ed, voguing & queer history. Do you have what it takes to get your GAY-CARD?". I was immediately intrigued. How could I say no to their invitation to go along? As someone who is part of the LGBTQIA+ community, I wish as a younger person I'd had lessons or been made aware of the communities history. I had to do the research myself, either on purpose or finding stuff completely by accident. Oh, interesting fact. The county with the second highest readership for my blog is Russia, so it will be interesting to see how this post does. Haha. 

          This show was at the Lion and Unicorn Theatre. That's twice in two days. I arrived slightly earlier as I knew I like the environment of the pub, and so I was able to relax before the show. As was the same when I went to see The Cardboard Kitchen Project, once the audience was let in we had to wait for maybe two minuets before the show started. I love it when I'm not sat down and made to wait for ages. Once again thought he theatre space was boiling hot. I felt so sorry for the actors. My view was also partially blocked by the people in front as the seating is mostly on one level. From the word go, the show throws you into the deep-end of queerness. I think one needs at least a little queer knowledge to actually enjoy this show, and I think this is the point. The show is full of references to queer culture. I think I got almost every reference, well at least I think I did, and I wont ruin anything in case anyone reading this goes to see the show.

          The show started a little slow, but gained speed exceptionally quickly. The three actors were very relatable, with all of them taking one or two different roles. As the only man in the cast I related heavily to Felix, played brilliantly by Nicholas Marrast-Lewis. There were so many of Felix's characteristics that reminded me not only of myself but EVERY gay man I've ever met. It was just a shame that Nicholas stumbled over one or two of his lines, but it didn't really cause much of an impact. Fizz Waller was also brilliant as Mary. She was extremely comedic yet had just the right amount of realism. She was probably the most interesting of the characters, in no small part to how Fizz portrayed her.

          There was however something that any reader of previous reviews will know that I hate. Audience interaction/participation. This wasn't too bad, with a little gay quiz thrown in part way through. It seemed totally out of place and unnecessary, but was at least interesting. There was another moment of interaction and that was the audience being asked to Vouge. again, it seemed very out of place. This was the bit I hated most, and thankfully I wasn't dragged up on stage to do it.

          It is not only funny, but has a couple of hard hitting messages. Firstly, Bisexual people are often discriminated against from within the queer community. They are often told they are 'going through a phase'. Gay people think they aren't ready to fully come out as gay, and straight people just get confused and call it a "phase". The second issue they picked up on was discovering your sexuality later in life. This is something lot of people within the LGBTQIA+ community struggle with. Many older people have, for whatever reason, been unable to be their authentic selves until they've settled into life. This can make coming out a scary and unnerving situation, to suddenly been thrown into a world completely different to the world you've been living in for years. Lastly, the show talks about the expectations within the queer community. What you should know. If you don't, then you are harshly judged. I've made it a mission of mine to research queer history. I feel I owe it to all the people who came before me. For all the people unable to be their true selves. For all the people who had to hide in the shadows. For all those who lost their lives. I try really hard to educate myself so I can educate others. This show tries to put a lighter spin on that, and so I must be grateful they are trying to get that message out there.

          A bit of light hearted fun, bit with a completely serious message. You don't need a 'Gay Card' to be a good member f the LGBTQIA+ community, but you should at least know a little of the communities history. The show is playing on August 21st, 22nd and 24th 2019 at the Lion and Unicorn Pub in Camden.

To book tickets or to find more about the show, please click here

Come Fly With Fred

          Come Fly With Fred was inspired by many honest and moving interactions with London’s homeless community, and created with the hope to shed light on the rollercoaster life thousands live everyday and make you chuckle along the way. For the show, one joins Fred on his daily search for friendship in an explosion of circus, spontaneous puppetry beat-boxing, break-dancing physical comedy and original spoken word. I was intrigued to be invited along to see what this show was all about.

          I saw this show while it was on at The Space on the Isle Of Dogs, London, a theatre space I've been to s few times before. As I've said before, its an interesting space in a converted church. It also has a reasonably priced bar/restaurant above it though this has very limited space.

          Come Fly With Fred is part of the Send in the Clowns Festival, a fortnight of foolery showcasing the best in clowning and physical comedy. It was also part of the line up for the 2019 Camden Fringe. There was seating for just 28 people (less than the theatre space can normally hold) and I'm sorry to say even then it wasn't full. The stage was also virtually empty, with just a blue bucket to one side. I sat down and looked through the information I was given upon entering the theatre. I saw three words and my heart sank. Continuous audience interaction. I hate audience participation/interaction at the theatre. Sometimes it can be ok, maybe in an improve show someone shouting a theme or theatre style. Actually the majority of productions at Shakespeare's Globe have some form of audience interaction and they do it brilliantly. For the most part though as soon as I see audience participation my heart sinks. I go to the theatre to be entertained by actors/performers. I don't come to the theatre to be part of the entertainment myself. That's why I'm in the audience and not on the stage.

          My overwhelming feeling while watching this show was that of awkwardness. I know the subject of homelessness was bound to be slightly awkward, however the room was overwhelmed by that feeling. It didn't help that the majority of the show was silent with the exception of the odd strange sound made by the performer, Lucas Bailey. This meant for most of the time the theatre was in complete silence, creating a feeling that wasn't the most comfortable. This may have been the intention, however it was far too overpowering for me to be fully engrossed in the show. Saying that, Lucas was a very talented performer having a plethora of skills that he made a point of displaying, from juggling to beat-boxing. His skills though couldn't break the awkwardness though. There were however funny moments in the show, but even these didn't save the show for me.

          There was a moment of spoken word, and this was the most powerful and emotive moment of the show. I would much preferred the show to have consisted mainly of this as I feel it could have been far more impactful. I also was taken by how quickly Lucas was able to change between different states of emotion and mental stability.

          This show is meant to make one think about the holes community and the struggles they go though in their lives on a daily basis. One moment however failed in this endeavour massively. Towards the end of the show 5 members of the audience were invited up on stage to take part in what can only be described as a human band/orchestra. The only assumption I can make is they were representing the different noises of London, that can often become be the metronome to a homeless persons life. After a while each member of this human band was then given a hat to ask the audience for money, like many homeless people do on the stress every day. This was clearly meant to be a moment where they were meant to feel the awkwardness of how this can often feel. Most of them however took it as a complete and utter joke, fake crying and making it into a piece of overacted comedy. In fact making the audience laugh at this poignant moment. I found this wholly disrespectful to not only the piece itself but for the performer wo for the past 35 minuets had pout his all into trying to make is feel a specific way.

          The shows ending was powerful, with Lucas sat alone at the back of the stage with his hat on the ground as though asking "can you spare some change". The reality for the majority of the homeless community. He then proceeded to go through the actions of getting ready to spend a night sleeping on the streets, with a clear emphasis on this being a scary and often dangerous experience for many in the homeless community. The powerfulness of the ending and of the spoken word however failed to redeem a piece of theatre I found mostly awkward (and not in the way I assume they intended). It could have been so much more powerful and I left slightly disappointed.

(I was struggling to give this either two or three stars, but I had to make a decision as I don't do halves)

For more information about Come Fly With Fred, please click here

For information about the homeless charity Centre Point, please click here 

Once On This Island

          I cant imagine why its taken so long for Once On This Island to return to the London stage. Ten years in fact. With a reasonably short running time and toe-tapping calypso, it makes for a fun theatre experience. Its based upon the novel 'My Love, My Love' by Rosa Guy, which has been described by Dante J.J. Bevilacqua as a Caribbean re-telling of Hans Christian Andersen's "The Little Mermaid with a dash of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet.". Using the structure of Haiti's rigid class system, it tells the story of a poor girl from one side of the island who falls in love with the aristocrat from the other side whom she nurses back to health.

          I can only say thank you to The British Theatre Academy for bringing this magical production back to the London stage. I know a lot of people are put off going to see a 'student production' but rest assured you will not be disappointed. Its also a shame, but a fact, that some people are likely to compare this production to the 2017 Broadway revival. I went into this though with an open mind, ready to be blown away.

          And oh was I blown way. What an absolutely stunning show. Yes its not to the scale or quality you'll find on Broadway, but its bloody close. The cast were all amazing with some interesting costume choices. I might add I'm sure the cast will all go on the have successful careers in theatre, if this show is anything to go by. They all worked well with each other and with the audience around them, using the traverse staging to the full. This is a style of staging I always think is tricky for actors, but they seemed to embrace it with open arms. I have to also complement Andrew Exeter on his sublime lighting that really enhanced to fantastic work of the actors but also complemented Lee Proud's direction and choreography.

          There are a couple of the actors however that I feel need a special mention. Firstly Aviva Tulley as Erzulie. She has arguably the most touching and emotional songs 'The Human Heart', which occurs almost two thirds of the way through the show. This role was originated by Andrea Frierson-Toney on the Broadway stage in 1990 and by the American sole singer P. P. Arnold when it came to the West End in 1994. In the 2017 Broadway revival this role was played by the legend that is Lea Salonga. Aviva in this production is undeniably absolutely stunning, and in my opinion is just as good as Lea Salonga (if not maybe a little better). I was moved to tears by her rendition of the song and I will forever remember her performance. It was so real and honest the whole audience was silent, captivated by her voice which had a real maturity in its soulfulness. I would recommend the show on her performance of this song alone. Secondly I'd like to mention Chrissie Bhima who plays Ti Moune. Another amazing singer who made this one of the most realistic characters I've seen on stage recently. She has to portray a whole range of emotions in a short space of time and she did this with complete and utter ease. Her voice was refined and powerful, allowing her to bare her emotions to the audience and other cast members with complete conviction. Even when she wasn't the focus of the scene (which was very rare seeing as she was on stage the majority of the time) I couldn't take my eyes off her. These two women, Aviva and Chrissie, will undoubtedly make successes of themselves on the stage and I really wish I get to see them perform again. They wouldn't seem out of place if you threw them onto the West End stage tomorrow.

          As for the men in the cast there are two who stood out over the rest These were Sam Tutty and Elliot Gooch as Daniel and Armand respectively. Both were performers who kept my attention and for all for the right reasons. Constantly in character and making themselves stand out in scenes, they also had great chemistry together and you could tell they were having fun on stage. Sam Tutty had charm and a bit of a cheeky twinkly in his eye, while his voice is mature while also having an innocence about it. All of which is perfect for the character of Daniel. He also had great chemistry while performing with Chrissie Bhima and their harmonies where a joy to listen to. I felt it took him a few moments to become comfortable on stage but when he did he never looked back. Elliot Gooch just seemed at home on the stage from the word go, and was a bit of a cheeky chappy throughout. I now know he's graduated from Bird College with a 1st Class BA (Hons) in Professional Dance and Musical Theatre and I'm really not surprised. Before the show started cast members were interacting with audience members, and Elliot trying to sell a couple of girls bamboo was the first to catch my attention (and make me laugh). He seemed completely at ease and was always someone my eye kept going back to. He kept my attention, even when he wasn't a major component of a scene. He just owned that stage. 

          I also cant really go without mentioning Jonathan Chen in the role of Asaka. Now I'm just going to get it out the way and say it. He's not as good as Alex Newell in the 2017 Broadway revival. Jonathan if your reading this, I'm sorry but its true. But please don't take that as me saying that it wasn't a great performance. That couldn't be further from the truth. It was a wonderfully joyous performance, full of the comedy and over the top sassiness. It took a while for Jonathan to feel comfortable in his role, and many times I could detect he was shaking. Performing in drag can be a very nerve racking experience, take my word for it, and so I wasn't surprised by his nerves. Not to mention he must have had Alex Newell's performance in the back of his head. I'm happy to say though that he hit every note and immediately after his big number, Mamma Will Provide, I could see the relief on his face. It was also nice after the song to see that the rest of the cast seeming to tap him on the back, touch his arm or give a nod as if to say 'Well done. That was great'. I couldn't agree more with them. He had nothing to worry about. My only issue was the makeup. It wasn't over the top enough and just seemed very understated in my opinion. I believe though that Jonathan did the makeup himself, so I hope he will get better as the production continues and as he gains experience. I also had an issue with the costume, not just for Jonathan but all the Gods in fact. I know there is obviously a limited budget for a production such as this, but I feel the Gods could have had a bit more time spent on their design. They all had removable headdresses which at times seemed to become a little cumbersome or they struggled to get them on quickly. Don't get me wrong they were good, but I'm sure they could have been much better if a little more effort had been put into them.

          Overall, this is a stunning performance. Not just by the main cast but the whole ensemble, all of whom put 100% into their performances. You could see this by the fun they all seemed to be having and the sweat dripping from them at the end of the show. How marvellous to see a new generation of performers enthusiastic about what they do, who all clearly love it with a passion. I hope they never loose that. My only wish now is that Once On This Island transfers to the West End, bringing some on the current cast with it. I know that I have seen stars of the future today. 

You don't have long, as the show is only running at Southwark Playhouse until 31st August.

To purchase tickets to the show, or to find out more information, please click here.

There's also currently a production touring North America, so for info or tickets please click here.

UPDATE!!! - SAM TUTTY HAS BEEN ANOUNCED AS PLAYING THE TITSL ROLE IN DEAR EVAN HANSEN IN THE WEST END. FOR TICKETS AND INFORMATION PLEASE CLICK HERE

Parenthood

          I was asked to attend the press night for this so was given a ticket, but believe me when I say that I wont hold me back from being honest.

          I was unfortunately disappointed by the show. The sound system in the theatre was shockingly bad. It was constantly crackling throughout the fist half of the show, and occasionally during the second half. The general acoustics of the building left a lot to be desired. For the majority of the songs I was really straining to hear the lyrics. When I could hear them, they were a mixture of over the top blue humour but also some genuinely witty phrases..

          Until the 27th July (2019) Parenthood is showing at The Space on the Isle Of Dogs in London. The Space is a theatre and community arts centre housed inside a converted church. The space itself is lovely, comprising of a small intimate theatre along with a reasonably priced bar/café/restaurant, that has an outside seating area. However, a musical, even one on such a small scale as Parenthood, really isn't appropriate for such a space. I came a couple years ago for a play involving just two actors. It was an interesting show and very much something I feel is far more appropriate for a space such as this. The only real negative with The Space as a venue, is its location. Its not the easiest place to get to and is relatively far out of central London. There's not really much to do in the area while waiting for the show either, meaning one is almost required to use their café. Although reasonably priced its extremely small, so can very easily get busy quickly. Oh, and I believe there is no air conditioning inside the theatre. Normally not an issue in London but in the heatwave the city is currently experiencing, its something my fellow audience members and I (and from the sweat on their faces I’d say some of the actors also) would have been very much appreciative of having.

          The set for the show was simple, with a few coloured blankets on the floor, a crib and about 25 or so scaled up versions of the wooden block with letters on you find in the toy boxes of small children learning to spell. That was it. The blocks were cleverly used throughout, to create seats/steps/surfaces for different scenes. The show followed what could only be described as the life cycle of a parent, form wanting a child all the way to being a grandparent. Although I enjoyed the majority of the music, there were some phrases that made me wince. A little to crass for my liking. There were some members of the audience however who were absolutely cackling with laughter. It almost seemed as if the writers were trying to invent funny situations, rather than pick up on real situations which are funny when you look back at them. From the rather crass song in which men brag about having a massive 'baby maker' and 'strong swimmers' to the mother complaining how annoying the baby is and how she's so pissed off with it. I get that these are all emotions that parents go through, but they didn't seem to be strung together well. The show at times felt disjointed, with the couples that had been set out at the beginning seeming to not be of any relevance at all until the closing number.

          At the beginning, the performers struggled to find their voice, though once they relaxed into the show they were in fine form. This wasn't helped by the shoddy tech work, which I believe was provided by the venue rather than the show. As I mentioned earlier, the cracking of mics was at times overpowering, but also wrong sound levels or mics being activated late meant some performers full vocals were unable to be appreciated by the audience. This was unless like me your were close to the stage. The lighting also left a lot to be desired, with the stage often plunged into darkness for what felt like an eternity, when actors had been in place almost as soon as the light went out.

          I think though there were a couple of actors that stood out for me. The first was Heather Broderick. An absolute breath of fresh are on one of the warmest nights. She was absolute comedy gold, yet bought believability every time she stepped on stage. Jordan-David Copping was also great though he did seem to take a little while to gain his confidence and get into full voice, but once he was one could only describe him as a bit of a cheeky chappy. I think Jordan Brown was also good, though he seemed to find it hard to connect with the audience, always looking just slightly over our heads. Astra Beadle was another that stood out, with good connections with the other performers and the audience as well as being in fine voice throughout.

I think this show has lots of potential, but was let down by the venues sound and lighting systems. The actors didn't seem relaxed but they have a good show. It just needs a bit more work and then I'm sure it would be perfectly adequate for some light evenings entertainment.

To find out more information or to book tickets, click here

(I'm giving this star rating due to the failures I encountered. It could have easily been higher if everything had gone better from the technical side of the show)